The FCA is reviewing complaints about motor finance commission models and has temporarily paused the usual 8-week deadline for firms to issue final responses.
Key Dates and Announcements
11 January 2024: The FCA announced that they would be conducting an industry review on vehicle finance Discretionary Commission models. They paused the 8-week deadline for handling complaints and providing final response letters.
The 8 week timeframe for providing a final response was paused from 17th November 2023 to 4th December 2025 and the FCA began consulting with firms and proposed to extend the pause to July 31st 2026.
This allowed time to consider an alternative way of dealing with DCA complaints, such as a consumer redress scheme if the FCA believed it to be appropriate.
You can find more information about the latest update from the FCA at the following link:
Car finance claims | FCA (Opens in new window)
25 October 2024: The Court of Appeal issued a judgment in relation to three appeals from previous motor finance Discretionary Commission claims and resulting county court judgments in favour of two lenders, FirstRand Bank trading as MotoNovo Finance, and Close Brothers Limited. The Court of Appeal judgment found in favour of the claimants and went beyond the established law and regulation for motor finance commission disclosure requirements.
11 December 2024: The lenders involved in the Court of Appeal hearing were given permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.
1 - 3 April 2025: The Supreme Court hearing took place. Please see below for the outcome of the hearing.
1 August 2025: The Supreme Court gave its judgment on the appeal and the FCA announced that it will begin a consultation on a possible customer redress scheme in early October 2025.
The Supreme Court found that car dealerships in motor finance arrangements do not hold duties of loyalty to the exclusion of their own interests. This means that dealerships are not legally required to prioritise the customer's interests above their own. Therefore, commission payments that customers are not aware of are not considered to be bribes. However, in some cases, a lack of transparency or fairness in how these agreements were presented to customers may be considered unfair under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.
7th October 2025: The Court of Appeal looked at three cases involving Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCA) with motor finance agreements. These cases involved two lenders - MotoNovo Finance and Close Brothers.
The Court agreed with the customer claims that dealers did have a responsibility to the customers to declare the commission paid.
What this means for you
If you have already made a complaint to Toyota Financial Services, you do not need to take any action at this time.